BYU FBLastW24–10vs Iowa StateNextvs Notre DameOct 17 · 5:30 PM MT

How to Follow BYU Swim and Dive at the 2026 CMU Shootout

How to follow BYU swim and dive at the 2026 CMU Shootout: Mountain start times, stream, live results, field and the Cougars' first real tests.

Read sources ↓ Updated Oct 1, 2026 Unofficial · public-source facts Swimming & Diving coverage Join free Cougar Report ↓
Original editorial image of an empty competition pool split between BYU blue lanes and Colorado Mesa maroon and gold lanes beneath a diving tower.

Visual: Original editorial image of an empty competition pool split between BYU blue lanes and Colorado Mesa maroon and gold lanes beneath a diving tower.

BYU swim and dive opens its regular season at the CMU Shootout on Friday, Oct. 2 and Saturday, Oct. 3 at El Pomar Natatorium in Grand Junction, Colorado. Friday begins at 4 p.m. Mountain. Saturday begins at 10 a.m. Mountain.

There is a real stream and a real results path. Colorado Mesa lists the RMAC Network broadcast and its live swimming results page for both sessions. No official radio coverage is listed.

The name on BYU’s schedule undersells the field. This is a six-school Intermountain Shootout with BYU, Utah, Utah Tech, host Colorado Mesa, Adams State and Western Colorado’s women. Colorado Mesa says Friday and Saturday will be scored as separate meets, so fans should expect two daily scoreboards rather than one running total that settles everything late Saturday.

BYU-CMU Shootout follow information

Event detailInformation
Meet2026 Intermountain Shootout, listed by BYU as the CMU Shootout
Friday sessionOct. 2 at 4 p.m. Mountain
Saturday sessionOct. 3 at 10 a.m. Mountain
VenueEl Pomar Natatorium, Grand Junction, Colorado
StreamColorado Mesa on the RMAC Network
Live resultsColorado Mesa swimming live results
RadioNo official radio listing published
FieldBYU, Utah, Utah Tech, Colorado Mesa, Adams State; Western Colorado women
Meet formatTwo days scored as separate meets
Official BYU eventsMen’s event 25479 and women’s event 25506
Permanent schedulesBYU men and BYU women

BYU’s records place both teams at the same 4 p.m. Friday start. The men’s event ends at 3 p.m. Mountain Saturday; the women’s event ends at 2 p.m. The host’s operational schedule is simpler for viewers: return to the same stream and results pages for the 10 a.m. Saturday session, then let the live board show when the last scored event is complete.

If one page looks empty before the first race, that does not mean the meet has been canceled. Swimming result pages often populate close to the session. The host schedule is the best backup for any late link change.

The score resets Saturday

This format changes how to read the weekend. Colorado Mesa says each day is a separate scored meet. Friday’s total is a result, not halftime of one two-day competition. Saturday begins a second scoring problem.

That matters because depth can look different when the event menu changes. A team can win Friday behind strong relays and short events, then lose ground Saturday when longer races or a different stroke group carries more weight. The daily reset also gives coaches immediate evidence about who can return the next morning and race well without a long recovery window.

Fans should save four sets of numbers:

  1. BYU men’s Friday score and place.
  2. BYU women’s Friday score and place.
  3. BYU men’s Saturday score and place.
  4. BYU women’s Saturday score and place.

Do not add the two days unless the host publishes a combined total. The official format says separate meets, and turning them into one homemade standings table would answer a question the competition is not asking.

BYU finally gets an outside comparison

The Navy-Royal opener gave BYU useful internal evidence, but it was built around custom distances and a team score that included competitions held during the week. Friday in Grand Junction is the first chance to compare Cougars with outside swimmers in a regular-season setting.

Tatum Cooley supplied the clearest women’s speed signal at the intrasquad meet. BYU’s official recap credits her with wins in the 125 butterfly, 75 freestyle and 25 freestyle, plus a place on the winning mixed 200 freestyle relay. Haylee Tiffany took the 600 and 250 freestyle, then finished second to Cooley in the three shorter races BYU reported.

The direct CMU question is not whether their odd-distance times convert neatly. They do not. Watch where Cooley appears in standard sprint and butterfly races, then watch whether Tiffany’s range lets BYU collect points across more than one part of the program. If they keep appearing near the front after the event lengths normalize, the intrasquad evidence travels.

The women’s team also returns Lucy Warnick, one of the five returning All-Big 12 athletes named in BYU’s schedule announcement. Warnick placed third in the 400 individual medley at the 2026 Big 12 Championships. She gives BYU a conference-tested standard that the opening meet did not fully need to reveal.

Nelson, Ferreira and the men’s scoring floor

Lucca Ferreira won the men’s 125 butterfly, 75 freestyle and 25 freestyle at Navy-Royal. Like Cooley, he now has to carry that short-course speed into standard events against another roster.

Tanner Nelson presents a different test. He won BYU’s 600 freestyle in 5:33.56 at the opener, but his more useful résumé comes from last February. Nelson won the Big 12 400 individual medley and later represented BYU in the 400 IM, 500 freestyle and 1,650 freestyle at the NCAA Championships.

A season opener does not need a personal best from Nelson to be useful. His first job is to establish BYU’s scoring floor in distance and medley races. Ferreira’s job is to show whether his preseason speed belongs at the front once the opposing lanes are occupied.

Easton Mousser, Peter Etzold and William Bonnett are the other returning men’s All-Big 12 athletes named by BYU. Mousser gives the distance group another proven conference scorer. Etzold and Bonnett return top-eight Big 12 breaststroke results. That distribution lets BYU attack more than one section of the meet, which matters when the score resets overnight.

The clean viewing order is Nelson and Mousser in the distance work, Etzold and Bonnett in breaststroke, then Ferreira wherever BYU deploys his early speed. The relays will show whether those individual pieces can become complete quartets.

Colorado Mesa is not a decorative host

The division label can fool people here. Colorado Mesa competes in Division II, but both Maverick programs finished third at the 2026 NCAA Division II Championships. The host enters this weekend as the unanimous RMAC favorite on both the men’s and women’s sides, chasing a ninth straight conference title for each program.

Colorado Mesa’s men return defending RMAC champions Aron Jonsson in both breaststrokes, Ben Vester in both individual medleys, Jonas Friess in the 200 freestyle and Micah Moore in the 200 butterfly. The women return conference champions Melina Giraudeau in both breaststrokes, Taylar Hooton in the 100 backstroke and Abby Uhl in the 200 backstroke.

That creates useful head-to-head lanes for BYU. Etzold and Bonnett get a host breaststroke group with actual championship wins. Nelson’s individual-medley standard meets Vester’s. Mousser’s distance work can be measured against Friess and a Colorado Mesa roster built to win its conference again.

The team result still needs context. BYU has won all 18 men’s meetings listed in Colorado Mesa’s official series history through January 2026. That history makes BYU the expected side in a direct men’s comparison. It does not erase the value of individual races against a nationally accomplished Division II program, especially in the first outside meet of October.

Utah adds the rivalry lane, while Utah Tech brings a veteran women’s group led by school record holders. Adams State and Western Colorado widen the scoring field. BYU is not driving to Grand Junction for one simple dual.

Five things worth tracking live

1. Standard distances after the custom opener

Cooley and Ferreira dominated unusual short races at Navy-Royal. Their first standard-event placements will tell us more than attempts to convert a 75 freestyle into a 100.

2. The second-day response

Because Saturday is scored separately, a strong Friday does not protect anybody. Look for swimmers who remain near their Friday placement and for relay groups that stay clean after the overnight reset.

3. Breaststroke depth

Etzold and Bonnett return conference scoring credentials. Colorado Mesa counters with Jonsson and Giraudeau. This is the first event family where both teams can put established championship results into adjacent lanes.

4. BYU’s relays

The intrasquad meet mixed the men’s and women’s groups. Grand Junction should provide a clearer look at regular relay combinations. Record the order, exchanges and placement before treating any quartet as settled for February.

5. Diving marks and qualifying context

The Navy-Royal rip contest measured entry quality, not a standard list. At CMU, use the official results to track event placement and published scores. Do not label a mark as a record or NCAA qualifying score unless the official result or recap says so.

How to follow the meet cleanly

Open the RMAC Network stream a few minutes before each session, then keep the live results page beside it. The video tells you who touched first. The results page should provide the official time, place and score after the race is processed.

For Friday, start at 4 p.m. Mountain and save that day’s final men’s and women’s totals. Return Saturday before 10 a.m. and begin a new line in your notes. If the stream and results disagree briefly, wait for the official board rather than freezing the first number shown on video.

There is no published radio route, and BYU’s event records do not currently carry their own live-results or broadcast fields. The host links are the honest access point. Generic swimming streams and old 2025 meet pages are not substitutes.

The next listed BYU event is the Alumni Meet in Provo on Oct. 10. That gathering has program value, but Grand Junction is the competitive receipt. By Saturday afternoon, BYU should know whether the speed from Cooley and Ferreira held up, whether Nelson’s group supplied the expected floor, and which swimmers could score twice in less than 24 hours.

Sources and further reading

The Newsletter

The Cougar Report

BYU scores, recruiting, and stats in your inbox. Free for BYU fans — unsubscribe anytime.

Join the list. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.

Related articles